When an industry isn't regulated by the government, it doesn't mean the industry has no standards. It just means the standards have to come from somewhere else.
In many fields — personal training, coaching, web development, mediation, and yes, most holistic healing — there's no government license required to practice. Anyone can hang out a shingle and start working with clients. This lack of regulation has both advantages (lower barriers to entry, more innovation) and disadvantages (quality varies wildly, consumers have limited recourse).
Into that gap step voluntary credentialing bodies: independent organizations that set standards, evaluate practitioners, and issue credentials that practitioners can earn by demonstrating they meet those standards.
This article is about how voluntary credentialing works, why it matters for unregulated industries, and what makes the difference between a credential worth having and one that isn't.
Voluntary credentialing is exactly what it sounds like: credentials that practitioners choose to pursue, issued by organizations that the practitioners are not legally required to join.
Unlike government licensure (which is mandatory to practice), voluntary credentials are earned by choice. A practitioner decides they want the credential, applies, goes through the review process, and either meets the standards or doesn't.
Some well-known examples of voluntary credentialing in other fields:
• The International Coaching Federation (ICF) credentials professional coaches
• The Project Management Institute (PMI) credentials project managers
• The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) credentials HR professionals
• The International Association of Professional Hypnotherapists credentials hypnotherapists
• Various massage therapy associations credential massage therapists in states where licensing isn't required
In each case, the credentialing body has no legal authority to prevent people from practicing without the credential. Their authority comes from the market value of the credential itself — if clients, employers, and referral partners value the designation, practitioners will pursue it voluntarily.
Even without legal authority, voluntary credentialing does several important things for an industry.
It creates a quality signal.
In an unregulated field, clients have no reliable way to distinguish qualified practitioners from unqualified ones. Credentials create a visible marker. Not a perfect one — credentialing bodies vary in rigor — but a starting point for client evaluation that wouldn't otherwise exist.
It establishes shared standards.
A credentialing body has to define what "qualified" means. That means publishing standards, creating frameworks, and developing a shared vocabulary for professional practice. Over time, these standards become the baseline that the whole field evolves around, even for practitioners who don't pursue the credential.
It creates ethical accountability.
Legitimate credentialing bodies come with published codes of ethics that credential-holders must agree to. This creates a framework where practitioners can be held accountable to something beyond their own judgment. If a client has a complaint, there's an organization they can contact. If a practitioner is operating unethically, there's a process for addressing it.
It provides practitioners with tools for growth.
Credentialing organizations typically offer ongoing resources: continuing education, professional development, community, networking, research updates. This supports practitioners in developing their practice over time.
It gives practitioners something to market.
A credential is a concrete asset in a practitioner's professional identity. They can display it, reference it, and use it to differentiate themselves. This is particularly valuable in fields where it's otherwise difficult to signal quality.
It creates pathways for integration.
As unregulated fields mature, opportunities for integration with regulated systems emerge — insurance coverage, hospital partnerships, corporate wellness programs, referral networks. Credentials are often a prerequisite for these opportunities.
Not all credentials are created equal. Some voluntary credentials are rigorous and meaningful. Others are closer to "membership" in a list that anyone can pay to join. Both exist, and practitioners (and clients) need to know the difference.
A meaningful credential typically has:
A clear application and review process. Not just "pay the fee." Meaningful credentials involve evaluation of the applicant's training, experience, and professional conduct. Some also include examinations, case reviews, or interviews.
Published standards. The criteria for earning the credential are publicly available. Anyone can read what's required and evaluate whether the standards are substantial.
A published code of ethics. Credential-holders agree to specific ethical standards, and the credentialing body has a process for enforcing them.
A public verification system. Third parties can look up any credentialed practitioner and confirm their current standing. This is what turns the credential into something verifiable rather than just a claim.
Independence from training schools. The credentialing body isn't the same organization that trained the practitioner. (If you get "certified" by the same school that taught you the modality, that's not quite the same thing as being credentialed by an independent evaluator.)
A renewal and accountability structure. The credential isn't a lifetime free pass. Practitioners maintain their standing through ongoing compliance with standards.
Real consequences for violations. If a practitioner violates the code of ethics, the credential can be suspended or revoked — and that action is visible to clients through the verification system.
Credentials that lack these elements may still have some value, but the value is limited. Credentials that have all of them create meaningful professional signal.
For clients trying to navigate an unregulated field, credentials are a useful starting point — not a guarantee.
A credential tells you:
• The practitioner has been evaluated against some standards
• They agreed to a code of ethics
• They're accountable to an organization
• You have recourse if something goes wrong
A credential doesn't tell you:
• Whether this specific practitioner is the right fit for you
• Whether their personal style will match what you need
• Whether their specific expertise aligns with your situation
Use credentials as a filter, not a final decision. Find practitioners who hold credentials you trust, then evaluate them individually for fit.
If you're a practitioner in an unregulated field deciding whether to pursue a credential, a few questions to consider:
Is this credential recognized by the people you want to reach? A credential only helps if clients, referral partners, and the broader market recognize it. Research what credentials are valued in your field and your region.
Does the credentialing body have rigorous standards? Apply the tests above. If the credential is essentially pay-to-join, it may not provide meaningful differentiation.
Does it align with your values? A credential is a commitment to a code of ethics. Make sure the ethical framework is one you're comfortable operating under.
What does it cost (in time and money) versus what it provides? Credentials that come with ongoing benefits (directory listings, professional development, community) offer more value than credentials that just issue a certificate and disappear.
Does it create opportunities? The best credentials open doors — to referral networks, institutional partnerships, corporate work, insurance relationships. Think about the downstream value, not just the initial designation.
Historically, most currently regulated professions started as unregulated fields with voluntary credentialing. Medicine, psychology, law, nursing, accounting — all of them went through decades of voluntary professional associations before formal government regulation caught up.
Voluntary credentialing is often the precursor to regulation. The standards developed by voluntary bodies become the baseline for government licensure when (or if) regulation eventually arrives. The practitioners who hold voluntary credentials are typically grandfathered into new regulatory structures.
This is one reason why holistic practitioners who pursue voluntary credentials today are positioning themselves well for the future. As the holistic field continues to professionalize — and potentially to see more formal regulation in the years ahead — the practitioners who already operate under rigorous voluntary standards will be best prepared.
The International Board of Healing is a voluntary credentialing body. We have no legal authority over holistic practitioners. No one has to pursue the HHC designation. Our authority comes from the meaningfulness of our standards, the rigor of our review process, and the value the credential provides to practitioners who earn it.
We take that seriously. We're not interested in being a rubber-stamp credential. We want the HHC designation to be a meaningful professional asset — something that actually helps credentialed practitioners build trust with clients, differentiate their practices, and contribute to raising the standards of holistic work as a whole.
That's what voluntary credentialing, done well, can do for an unregulated industry. And it's what we're committed to building for the holistic healing field.
Learn more about the HHC designation and IBOH's approach to voluntary credentialing at [iboh.org].